c. Перепроектирование процесса конц

c. Перепроектирование процесса концентрирует внимание и усилия на совершенствовании существующего процесса. Перепроектирование обычно применяютктемпроцессам,которыеуспешно работают и в настоящий момент, но требуют коррекции в связи с изменившимися требованиями и потребностями клиента или потребителя. При перепроектировании процесса разрабатывается имитационная модель его текущего состояния. Перепроектирование имеет достаточно широкий спектр применения. По оценкам Д. Харрингтона, этот метод можно использовать для 70-90% основных бизнес-процессов. Нередко перепроектирование процесса проводят параллельно со сравнительным анализом (бенчмаркингом), чтобы перепроектированный процесс не оказался хуже или лучше соответствующего эталона.
Привлекательность перепроектирования процесса обусловлена тем, что этот метод позволяет уменьшать затраты, сокращать длительность цикла процесса, проводить работы от 80 до 100 дней и снижать количество ошибок на 30-60%.
Недостатки метода связаны с тем, что он в большей степени ориентирован на совершенствование бизнес-процессов или процессов, обеспечивающих те или иные функции управления. Тем самым он укрепляет позиции традиционных функционально-иерархических структур, не изменяя их содержания.
d. Инжиниринг процесса как метод совершенствования процессов организации воспринимается сегодня неоднозначно. Само понятие «инжиниринг» заимствовано из инженерной деятельности. Некоторые исследователи рассматривают инжиниринг процессов как общее понятие, включающее реинжиниринг бизнес-процессов и совершенствование бизнеса. Ряд исследователей выделяют понятие бизнес-инжиниринг и определяют его как проектирование бизнес-процессов и систем управления компанией «с чистого листа».
Инжиниринг как метод совершенствования процессов функционирующей организации, по нашему мнению, сложно представить исходя лишь из того, что если функционирует организация, то уже осуществляется деятельность, значит, хотим мы того или нет, существуют и процессы деятельности. Насколько они интегрированы и оптимальны — это вопрос другого порядка. Его можно решить посредством различных подходов к проектированию. Поэтому было бы справедливо инжиниринг процесса (процессов)считатьметодом проектирования бизнес-процессов вновь создаваемых организаций или бизнес-процессов новых видов бизнеса в существующих организациях с учетом передового опыта и принципа оптимальности в управлении процессами. В зависимости от того, на какую модель управления будет ориентирован инжиниринг процесса — функционально-специализированное или процессное управление — будет зависеть его радикальность. Тем не менее, основываясь на ориентации инжиниринга, направленного на процессы деятельности (бизнес-процессы), его можно отнести к одному из методов процессного управления. С другой стороны, если инжиниринг процесса в рамках действующей организации создает процессы новых видов деятельности, то, учитывая взаимосвязанность и взаимодействие всех процессов организации, в конечном счете может привести к изменениям в существующей бизнес-системе, желательно к позитивным. Если изменения стимулируют результативность организации, их можно считать направленными на совершенствование. С этой точки зрения инжиниринг процесса можно косвенно относить к методам совершенствования процессов деятельности.

Results (English) 1:

c. Re-engineering process concentrates the attention and efforts to improve the existing process. Re-engineering usually primenâûtktemprocessam, kotoryeuspešno work, and at the moment, but require correction by the changing demands and needs of the customer or consumer. When re-designing process simulation model is developed to its current state. Re-engineering has quite a wide range of applications. According to d. Harrington, this method can be used to 70-90% of core business processes. Process re-engineering are often carried out in conjunction with the comparative analysis (benchmarking) to the redesigned process has turned out to be worse or better than the standard. The attractiveness of the redesign process is due to the fact that this technique allows you to reduce costs, shorten the duration of the process, conduct work from 80 to 100 days and reduce the number of errors at 30-60%. Disadvantages of this method are that it increasingly focuses on improving business processes or processes that the functions of the Office. It thus strengthens the position of traditional functional-hierarchical structures, without altering their content. d. the Engineering process as a method of improving the perceived today is ambiguous. The very concept of "Engineering" is borrowed from the engineering activities. Some researchers consider engineering as a general concept that includes the reengineering of business processes and improving business. A number of researchers highlight the concept of business engineering and define it as designing business processes and control systems of the company from scratch. Engineering as a method of improving functioning organization, in our view, it is hard to imagine based only on the fact that if the organization operates, it already is, then, whether we like it or not, there are processes and activities. How they are integrated and optimal is a question of another order. It can be solved by different approaches to design. It would therefore be fair to engineering process (processes) sčitat′metodom business process design of newly created organizations or business-new business processes in existing organizations based on best practices and the best value for money principle in governance processes. Depending on what model of governance will target engineering process — functionally specialized or process management — will depend its radicalness. However, based on the orientation of engineering aimed at processes of activity (business processes), it can be attributed to one of the methods of process management. On the other hand, if the engineering process within the organization creates processes of new activities, in view of the interdependence and interaction of all processes of the Organization, could eventually lead to changes in the existing business system, preferably to positive. If changes to stimulate the efficiency of the Organization, they can be considered as aimed at improving. From this point of view, the engineering process can be indirectly attributed to the methods of process improvement activities.

Results (English) 2:

c. Redesigning the process and focuses its efforts on improving the existing process. Redesigning usually primenyayutktemprotsessam, kotoryeuspeshno work and at the moment, but require correction due to changed requirements and needs of the customer or consumer. When redesigning the process simulation model is developed to its current state. Redesign has a fairly wide range of applications. According to the D. Harrington, this method can be used for 70-90% of core business processes. Often the redesign process is carried out in parallel with the comparative analysis (benchmarking) to redesign the process is not proved better or worse than the corresponding standard.
The attractiveness of the redesign process is due to the fact that this method allows us to reduce costs, shorten cycle time of the process, the work of 80 to 100 days and reduce the number of errors by 30-60%.
Drawbacks associated with the fact that he is more focused on improving business processes or processes that provide certain management functions. He thus strengthens the position of the traditional functional and hierarchical structures without changing their content.
D. Engineering process as a method of improving the processes of the organization is perceived today is ambiguous. The concept of "engineering" is borrowed from engineering activities. Some researchers consider process engineering as a general concept that includes business process reengineering and improvement of the business. Some researchers distinguish the concept of business engineering and define it as the design of business processes and systems of management of the company "from scratch."
Engineering as a method of improving the processes of the organization functioning, in our opinion, it is difficult based only on the fact that if an organization operates, the existing activities, it means that whether we like it or not, there are activities and processes. How they are integrated and optimized - it is a question of a different order. It can be solved by different approaches to design. Therefore, it is fair to engineering process (es) schitatmetodom designing business processes newly created organizations or business processes of new businesses in existing organizations with the best practices and principles for good governance in the process. Depending on which model of management will be focused engineering process - functionally specialized or process management - it will depend on radical. Nevertheless, based on the orientation of engineering aimed at processes activity (business processes), it can be assigned to one of the methods of process control. On the other hand, if the engineering of the process within the existing organization processes create new activities, given the interconnectedness and interaction of all processes of the organization, could eventually lead to changes in the existing business system, it is desirable to positive. If changes stimulate the performance of the organization, they can be considered to improve the. From this perspective, the process engineering can be indirectly related to the methods of process improvement activities.

Results (English) 3:

C. The process redesign concentrates attention and efforts on improving the existing process. Redesign usually применяютктемпроцессам,которыеуспешно operate and in the present moment,But they require correction in connection with changing requirements and needs of the customer or consumer. In redesigning the process simulation model is being developed its current status.Redesign has a sufficiently wide range of application. It is estimated that D. Harrington, this method can be used for 70-90% core business processes.Often redesign process will be escorted in parallel with a comparative analysis (STESEG), to this redesigned process is not worse or better than the corresponding standard.