Что делает писателя хорошим?Это оче

Что делает писателя хорошим?
Это очень хороший вопрос, но на него нет однозначного ответа. У каждого читателя на этот счет свое мнение. Эти мнения как правило схожи, но и могут различаться.
Писатель тоже человек. В своих рассказах, поэмах, историях, романах он заключает определенный смысл. Он отражает в них свое видение мира, свое мнение, а также протест, призыв к чему-то. Но он зачастую скрыт, и иногда нужно не раз прочитать произведение, чтобы найти, понять его. Опять таки возвращаясь к нашему вопросу «Что делает писателя хорошим?», то стоит остановиться вот на каком момент и поймать себя на мысли. Что я чувствую после прочтения? Какие чувства во мне? Или я не испытал никаких ощущений? Для писателя важно, так сказать, дать пищу для размышления читателю, заставить его думать о прочитанном. Если это сказка, то порадоваться, что добро победило зло. Если это история, то проанализировать ее. Если это роман, то понять в чем заключается его проблема. Уже на этом этапе можно дать оценку автору. По мимо этого, смысл содержания должен быть актуален на все времена, где каждый мог бы перенести эту актуальность на сегодняшний день. Возможно, писатель характеризует в своем произведение много персонажей и описывает их жизнь. И для писателя важно отобразить в них такие качества, которые были, есть и будут в человеке. Тогда каждый читатель может найти ''себя'', то есть персонажа очень схожего с читателем. Это еще один весомый аргумент, который делает писателя хорошим.
Также хочется заметить, что не каждый писатель может написать живой текст. Некоторые авторы пишут очень скучно, нудно и уже вначале книги отбивают интерес для дальнейшего чтения. А другие наоборот, вроде бы используют те же слова и пишут на одном языке, а их произведение держит читателя в напряжение до самого конца книги. То ли это чувство языка, то ли что-то еще. Но это факт.
В заключение, хотелось бы все-таки сказать, что нет «плохих» или «хороших» писателей, а есть «твой» или «не твой» писатель.

Results (English) 1:

What makes a good writer?This is a very good question, but there is no definite answer. Every reader on this opinion. These views tend to be similar, but may vary.The writer too, man. In his stories, poems, stories, novels, he finds some merit. It reflects the vision of the world, its view, and the protest, appeal to something. But it is often hidden, and sometimes you need to repeatedly read the piece to find, understand it. Again, going back to our question "what makes a good writer?", it is worth to stay here for a moment and catch myself on thought. What I feel after reading? What feelings in me? Or I did not experience any sensations? For the writer, it is important to say so, give food for thought to the reader, make him think of read. If it is a fairy tale, then rejoice that the good defeated evil. If it's history, then analyze it. If it is a novel, then understand what is its problem. At this point, you can provide an assessment of the author. After this, the meaning of the content must be relevant at all times where everyone could transfer this urgency today. Perhaps the writer describes in his work many of the characters and describes their lives. And for the writer, it is important to display such qualities that were, are and will be in man. Then, each reader can find themselves ' ', that is, a character very similar to the reader. This is another argument that makes a good writer. Also I would like to note that not every writer can write live text. Some authors write very boring, tedious and first book beat off interest for further reading. While others, like using the same words and write in one language and their work keeps the reader in voltage until the very end of the book. Whether it is the sense of language, or something else. But it is a fact.In conclusion, I would still say that there is no "bad" or "good" writers, and have "your" or "yours" writer.

Results (English) 2:

What makes a good writer?
It's a very good question, but it does not have a clear answer. Each reader in this respect his opinion. These views are generally similar, but may vary.
The writer is also a man. In his stories, poems, stories, novels, he makes some sense. It reflects in their vision of the world, their opinions and protest, appeal to something. But it is often hidden, and sometimes you have no time to read the work, to find, to understand it. Again, going back to our question, "What makes a good writer?", You should stop here and at what time to catch myself thinking. I feel that after reading? What kind of feelings in me? Or I have not experienced any sensations? For a writer, it is important, so to speak, to give food for thought to the reader, make him think about the read. If this is a fairy tale, then rejoice that good defeat evil. If this story, then analyze it. If this novel, I realized what his problem is. Already at this stage it is possible to assess the author. By passing this, the meaning of the content must be relevant at all times, where everyone could bring this urgency today. Perhaps the writer describes in his work of many characters and describes their lives. And for the writer, it is important to display such qualities in them that have been, are and will in man. Then each reader can find 'ourselves'', that is, the character is very similar to the reader. This is another strong argument that makes a good writer.
I would also like to note that not every writer can write a live text. Some authors write very boring, tedious, and already at the beginning of the book discourage interest for further reading. Others on the contrary, seems to be using the same words and write the same language, and their product keeps the reader in suspense until the very end of the book. Is it the sense of language, or something else. But it is a fact.
In conclusion, I would still say that there is "bad" or "good" writers, but there is "your" or "not your" writer.

Results (English) 3:

What makes a good writer?
this is a very good question, but there is no clear answer. For each reader to this through its opinion. These views as a rule are similar, but may vary.
a writer too.In their stories, epic poem 'Sirlar Xasinasi', stories, David Copperfield he finds a certain meaning. It reflects in their vision of the world, their views, as well as protest, as called for in the. But he is often hidden,And sometimes you have no time to read the work, to find, to understand it. Again, going back to our question "What makes a good writer? ", it is worth to mention here is at what time and to catch the thought.That i feel after reading? What feelings in me? Or I did not experience any discomfort? It is important for a writer, so to speak, to give some food for thought the reader, in order to force it to think about overcoming dissenting opinions. If this tale,The rejoice, that welcome defeated evil. If it is a history, it is to analyze it. If this is a novel, it is to understand what is the problem. Already at this point, you can evaluate the author. On passing this,The content should be relevant for all times, where each could be moved to the relevance to the present day. Perhaps, a writer describes in his piece many characters and describes their lives.And for a writer it is important to show them such quality, which have been, are and will be in man. Then each reader may find "themselves", that is a character very similar to scared. This is yet another strong argument,Which makes a good writer.
Also want note that not every writer can write a living text. Some of the authors write very boring, Condoleezza Rice and first book already treats interest for further reading.And the other vice versa, seemed to use the same words and write the same language, and their piece keeps readers in the voltage up to the very end of book. Is it a sense of language, whether or not that is. But this is a fact.
in conclusion,Would like to say that there is no "bad" or "good" writers, and there is a "thou shalt" or "Thou shalt not" writer.