Конкретное содержание различных фор

Конкретное содержание различных форм совместной деятельности имеют определенные соотношение отдельных «вклада» участников. Так одна из схем предлагает три возможные формы, или модели:
1) когда каждый участник делает свою часть работы вместе независимо от другой-«совместно Индивидуальная деятельность (пример-некоторые производственные бригады, где каждый член его задач);
2) при выполнении общих задач последовательно по каждой партии «совместно последовательная деятельность (пример конвейер);
3) когда есть одновременное взаимодействие каждого участника со всеми другими-«совместная деятельность» (пример спортивных команд, академических групп или конструкторское бюро)
Таким образом психологическая картина взаимодействия в каждой из этих моделей, характерные для каждого случая.
Сотрудничество это-рекурсивный процесс, где два или более человек или организаций работать вместе для достижения общих целей, (например интересные взятая , что творческий характер) путем обмена информацией, обучения и формирования консенсуса. Это больше, чем пересечение общего назначения, наблюдается в кооперативных предприятий, и глубокие, коллективные решения для достижения той же цели.
Большинство сотрудничество требует руководства, хотя форма руководства может быть социальным, в частности в рамках децентрализованных групп.
Команда работает вместе можно получить больше ресурсов, признание и вознаграждение, условия конкуренции за ограниченные ресурсы.

Широкий спектр возможностей взаимодействия как социально психологическое явление, различные формы ее прогресса в различных социальных средах, влияние на личность, основы неравномерно ученых, которые изучили вопросы, используется в их соответствующих теоретических конструкций. Один из самых известных среди них была теория социальных действий (м. Вебер, т. Парсонс и др.), которые в различные способы описания отдельных действий, а также компоненты взаимодействия: люди, связи между ними, влияние друг на друга. Главная задача, он будет искать превалирующие факторы мотивации действий. В широком контексте человеческой деятельности, по словам его последователей, является результатом индивидуальных действий (элементарных действий), которые образуют систему действий. Элементы закона (одинарного действия) — лидер (тот, кто осуществляет акт); другой (тот, который руководил работ); норма, согласно которой организуется взаимодействие ;ценности, которых придерживается каждый из участников; ситуация, в которой проводится акция.

J американских социальных психологов. Тибо и г. Келли утвержденных модели, суть которого сводится к следующим положениям:
-любые межличностные отношения это реальное взаимодействие, Обмен поведенческих реакций в конкретной ситуации;

-будут продолжать взаимодействие и положительно оценивать участников, если они могут извлечь пользу от него;

Results (English) 1:

The specific content of the various forms of cooperative activities have a certain relationship of "contribution" of the participants. As one of the three possible forms, offers or model:1) when each participant makes his work together regardless of the other "shared Private activities (example-some production units, where each Member in his taskbar);2) in common tasks sequentially on each party "together successive activities (e.g. pipeline);3) when there are simultaneous interaction of each party with all the other-"working together" (for example, sports teams, academic teams and Design Bureau)Thus the psychological picture of the interaction of each of these models specific to each case.Collaboration is a recursive process where two or more people or organizations work together to achieve common goals, (for example an interesting piece that inspirational) by sharing knowledge, learning and building consensus. This is more than a general purpose, cross is seen in cooperative enterprises, and deep, collective solutions to achieve the same purpose.Most cooperation requires leadership, although the form of leadership can be social, in particular in the framework of decentralized groups.The team works together to get more resources, recognition and remuneration, the conditions of competition for limited resources.A wide range of interactive features as a social psychological phenomenon, different forms of its progress in different social environments, influence on the personality, the foundations uneven scientists who have studied the issues used in their respective theoretical constructions. One of the most famous among them was the theory of social action (m. Weber, t. Parsons and others), who in various ways to describe individual actions, as well as components of interaction: people, relationships, influence each other. The main task, he will look for the prevailing factors of motivation for action. In the broader context of human activity, according to his followers, is the result of individual actions (Elementary operations), which form a system action. Elements of the law (single action) was the leader (one who carries out the Act); the other (the one who directed the works); the rule that is being organized by the collaboration; the values of each of the parties; the situation in which the action is carried out.J of American social psychologists. Theobald and g. Kelly approved model, the essence of which is limited to the following provisions:-any interpersonal relationship is real interaction, exchange of behavioural responses in a given situation;-will continue to positively assess the parties and, if they can benefit from it;

Results (English) 2:

The specific content of the various forms of joint activities have certain ratio of the individual "contribution" of participants. So one of the schemes offers three possible forms, or model:
1) when one party is doing its part together regardless of drugoy- "jointly Individual activity (for example, some of the production team, where each member of his tasks);
2) when performing common tasks sequentially for each party "together successive operations (for example conveyor);
3) when there is a simultaneous interaction of each participant with all drugimi- "Joint Ventures" (example sports teams, academic groups and design office)
Thus the psychological picture of the interaction of each of these models specific to each case.
Cooperation is a recursive process where two or more people or organizations work together to achieve common goals (eg an interesting take that creative nature) by sharing information, learning and building consensus. This is more than the intersection of general purpose, there is a co-operative enterprises, and deep, collective solutions to achieve the same purpose.
Most collaboration requires leadership, although the form of management may be social, in particular in the framework of decentralized groups.
The team works together, you can get more resources recognition and remuneration, conditions of competition for scarce resources. A wide range of opportunities for cooperation as a social psychological phenomenon, various forms of its progress in various social environments, the impact on the individual bases unevenly scientists who have studied the questions used in their respective theoretical constructions. One of the most famous among them was the theory of social action (m. Weber, t. Parsons et al.), Which in various ways to describe the specific actions, as well as interoperability components: people, the connection between them, influence each other. The main task, he will seek the prevailing motivators of action. In the broader context of human activity, according to his followers, is the result of individual actions (elementary operations), which form a system of action. Elements of Law (single action) - the leader (the one who carries out the act); the other (the one who led the work); rule that organized interaction; values ​​upheld by each of the participants; situation in which the action is carried out. J American social psychologists. Thibaut and Kelley, the approved model, which essentially boils down to the following provisions: are any interpersonal relationship is real interaction, exchange of behavioral responses in a particular situation; -will continue cooperation and appreciates the participants if they can benefit from it;

Results (English) 3:

The specific content of the different forms of joint activities have a certain ratio of the "contribution" parties. So one of the schemes suggested three possible forms, or model:
(1) when each party is doing its part of the work, however, independently of the other, the "co-individual activities (for example, some production brigade, where each member of its tasks) ;
(2) the fulfilment of the overall objectives of each party, jointly consistent activities (for example transport) ;
(3) when there is a simultaneous interaction between each party with all the other, "joint activities" (example sports teams, academic groups or design bureau)
Thus psychological picture interaction in each of these models, specific to each case-by-case basis.
cooperation that is a recursive process,Where two or more people or organizations work together to achieve common goals, (for example interesting alone , that creative nature) through the exchange of information, training, and building consensus. This is no longer,General purpose than intersection, there is a in cooperative enterprises, and deep, collective decisions to achieve the same goal.
most collaboration requires leadership,The form of the guide may be social, in particular in the framework of decentralized groups.
command is running, however, you can get more resources, recognition and reward,Conditions of competition for limited resources.lord a wide spectrum of possibilities for interaction as a socio-psychological phenomenon, various forms of its progress in the different social environments, the impact on the person,The unevenly scientists, who have studied issues, to be used in their respective theoretical design. One of the most famous among them was the theory social action (m. Weber, t. Was wearing khaki shorts, etc. ),Which, in different ways for a description of individual action, as well as interoperable components: people, the links between them, the impact on each other. The challenge, he will > prevailing factors motivating action.In the broader context of human activities, in the words of his followers, is the result of individual action (basic action), which form a system of action.The elements of law (single action) - the leader (the one, who is carrying out an act); the other (the one, who presided over work); the rule, according to which is organized interaction ;values,Followed by each of the participants; the situation in which a promotion.lord J of American social psychologists. Thiebaud and Kelly approved model, the essence of which is limited to the following provisions:
-Any interpersonal relations this is a real interaction, the exchange of behavioral reactions in a specific situation;lord -will continue to interaction and positively evaluate participants,If they can benefit from it;