Позицию Boycko, дополняет Sachs, ко

Позицию Boycko, дополняет Sachs, который считает, что решением чиновничьего произвола должна была стать приватизация.

Results (English) 1:

Position Boycko, complements the Sachs, who believes that the decision of arbitrariness was supposed to privatization.

Results (English) 2:

The position Boycko, adds Sachs, who believes that the decision of bureaucratic arbitrariness was to be privatized.

Results (English) 3:

Position Bоyсkо, complements Sachs, who is of the view that the decision considering defamation cases was to be privatization.