ЕСЛИ В КОЛЛЕКТИВЕ ЕСТЬ РАЗНОГЛАСИИ

ЕСЛИ В КОЛЛЕКТИВЕ ЕСТЬ РАЗНОГЛАСИИ ВО МНЕНИИ, Я СЧИТАЮ, ЧТО ВПЕРВУЮ ОЧЕРЕДЬ НЕОБХОДИМО ВЫСЛУШАТЬ МНЕНИЕ ТОГО, КТО СОЗДАЛ РАЗНОГЛАСИЕ, ВЫЯСНИТЬ ПРИЧИНУ, ЗАТЕМ ОБЬЯСНИТЬ ПОЧЕМУ МЫ ПРЕДЛАГАЕМ СВОЙ ВАРИАНТ ДЛЯ РЕШЕНИ ЗАДАЧИ. ВЗВЕСИТЬ ВСЕ «ЗА» И «ПРОТИВ» И ПРИЙТИ К ОДНОМУ МНЕНИЮ, ЧЬЕ РЕШЕНИЕ ПО МНЕНИЮ СПЕЦИАЛИСТОВ БУДЕТ СЧИТАТЬСЯ ПРАВИЛЬНЫМ

Results (English) 1:

IF THE TEAM HAS A VARIANCE IN OPINION, I BELIEVE THAT FIRST OF ALL YOU NEED TO HEAR FROM SOMEONE WHO HAS CREATED CONTROVERSY, EXPLANATION, THEN EXPLAIN WHY WE OFFER YOUR OWN VERSION FOR DECISION TASK. WEIGH ALL THE PROS AND CONS AND COME TO THE SAME VIEW, ACCORDING TO EXPERTS WHOSE DECISION WILL BE DEEMED CORRECT

Results (English) 2:

IF in the team there are differences of opinion, I believe that the first step is to hear the views of the person who created differences, find out the reason, explain THEN WHY WE offers its own version to solve the problem. Weigh the "pros" and "cons" and come to one view, WHOSE DECISION ACCORDING TO EXPERTS WILL BE RIGHT

Results (English) 3:

if there are differences in the collective mind, i believe that for the first time the turn should listen to the voices of those who made the difference, find out the reason, then explain why we offer an alternative for the decision task. weigh the pros and cons and come to one view, whose decision on the opinion of experts will be right