ЕСЛИ В КОЛЛЕКТИВЕ РАЗНОГЛАСИИ ВО МН

ЕСЛИ В КОЛЛЕКТИВЕ РАЗНОГЛАСИИ ВО МНЕНИИ Я СЧИТАЮ ЧТО ВПЕРВУЮ ОЧЕРЕДЬ НЕОБХОДИМО ВЫСЛУШАТЬ МНЕНИЕ ТОГО, КТО СОЗДАЛ РАЗНОГЛАСИЕ, ВЫЯСНИТЬ ПРИЧИНУ, ЗАТЕМ ОБЬЯСИТЬ ПОЧЕМУ МЫ ПРЕДЛАГАЕМ СВОЙ ВАРИАНТ ДЛЯ РЕШЕНИ ЗАДАЧИ. ВЗВЕСИТЬ ВСЕ «ЗА» И «ПРОТИВ» И ПРИЙТИ К ОДНОМУ МНЕНИЮ, ЧЬЕ РЕШЕНИЕ ПО МНЕНИЮ СПЕЦИАЛИСТОВ БУДЕТ СЧИТАТЬСЯ ПРАВИЛЬ

Results (English) 1:

IF THE COLLECTIVE OPINION IN THE OPINION I BELIEVE THAT FIRST OF ALL YOU NEED TO HEAR FROM SOMEONE WHO HAS CREATED CONTROVERSY, FIND OUT WHY, AND THEN OB'JASIT' WHY DO WE OFFER YOUR OWN VERSION FOR DECISION TASK. WEIGH ALL THE PROS AND CONS AND COME TO THE SAME VIEW, ACCORDING TO EXPERTS WHOSE DECISION WILL BE DEEMED CORRECT

Results (English) 2:

IF in the collective differences of opinion, I believe that for the first time all it is necessary to listen to opinion who created differences, find out the cause, THEN WHY ARE WE OBYASIT offers its own version to solve the problem. Weigh the "pros" and "cons" and come to one view, WHOSE DECISION ACCORDING TO EXPERTS WILL BE REGULATION

Results (English) 3:

if the group differences in opinion, i think that for the first time the turn should listen to the voices of those who made the difference, find out the reason, then обьясить why we offer the option for the decision task. weigh the pros and cons and come to one view, whose decision on the opinion of experts will be правиль