Поскольку теоретические вопросы в о

Поскольку теоретические вопросы в области образования выходят из различных концепций и интерпретаций социальной реальности, различные парадигмы, такие как позитивизм и анти-позитивизма были эволюционировали, чтобы определить критерии, по которым можно было бы выбрать и определить проблемы для исследования.

Позитивист парадигма основана на философских идей французского философа Огюст Конт, который заявил, наблюдение, эксперимент являются основой истинного знания и разума как средство понимания человеческого поведения (Cohen и соавт., 2000).

По словам Коэна и соавт. (2000) анти-позитивизм подчеркивает, что социальная реальность рассматривается и интерпретируется самой личности в соответствии с идеологических позиций она обладает. Кроме того, анти-позитивисты считают, что реальность такова, многослойный и сложный (Коэн и др, 2000) и один феномен, имеющий множество интерпретаций.

Оба парадигм имеет различные методы исследования, которые могут быть использованы при проведении научных исследований.

Позитивизм включает в себя методы, посвященные количественному анализу, обзоры, эксперименты и т.п., и анти-позитивизма empazises по методам, ориентированных на качественный анализ, например, личные интервью, участник наблюдения, учет лиц, личные конструкты и т.д.

Results (English) 1:

Since the theoretical issues in the field of education have different perspectives and interpretations of social reality, different paradigms such as positivism and anti-positivism were evolved, to determine the criteria on which to select and define the problems for study.

Positivist paradigm is based on the philosophical ideas of the French philosopher Auguste Comte, who said surveillance, the experiment is the basis for true knowledge and wisdom as a means of understanding human behavior (Cohen et al., 2000).

According to Cohen et al. (2000) anti-positivism stresses that social reality is viewed and interpreted the personality in accordance with ideological positions she possesses. In addition, anti-Einstein ignored some mainstream developments believe that reality is multi-layered and complex (Cohen et al, 2000) and one phenomenon that has many interpretations.

Both paradigms have different research methods that can be used for research.

Positivism includes methods for quantitative analysis, surveys, experiments, etc., and anti-empazises on the methods of positivism, focused on qualitative analysis, for example, personal interviews, participant observation, registration of persons, personal constructs etc.

Results (English) 2:

Since the theoretical issues in the field of education out of the different concepts and interpretations of social reality, different paradigms, such as positivism and anti-positivism were evolved to determine the criteria by which to select and define problems for research. positivist paradigm is based on the philosophical ideas French philosopher Auguste Comte, who said observation, experiment, are the foundation of true knowledge and understanding as a means of understanding human behavior (Cohen et al., 2000). According to Cohen et al. (2000) anti-positivism emphasizes that social reality is seen and interpreted by the individual in accordance with the ideological positions it has. Additionally, anti-positivists believe that the reality is a multilayered and complex (Cohen et al, 2000) and another phenomenon having many interpretations. Both paradigms have various methods of investigation that may be used for research. Positiveness includes methods dedicated to the quantitative analysis, surveys, experiments, etc., and anti-positivism empazises by methods focused on qualitative analysis, such as personal interviews, participant observation, records of persons, personal constructs, etc.

Results (English) 3:

Since theoretical issues in the field of education are from the various concepts and interpretation of social reality, the various paradigms, such as positivism have and anti-positivism have been evolved,To determine the criteria on which could be selected and to identify the problems for the study. Lord Позитивист paradigm is based on the philosophical ideas French philosopher Auguste Comte, who stated, surveillance,The experiment are the foundation of a true knowledge and wisdom as a means understanding human behavior (Cohen and by M.A.., 2000). The Lord said that Cohen and by M.A.. (2000) anti-positivism have stresses,That the social reality is considered and is interpreted by the individual in accordance with ideological positions it has. In addition, anti-позитивисты believe that the reality is that,A multi-layered and complex (Cohen and others, 2000) and one phenomenon, with many interpretations. Lord both paradigms has various methods research, which can be used in the conduct of scientific research.

Positivism have includes the methods, focusing on quantitative analysis, surveys, experiments, etc. ), and anti-positivism empаzises on methods, results-oriented quality of the analysis, for example, personal interviews,Participant observation, the accounting for personal конструкты, etc..