Подавляющее большинство программ с

Подавляющее большинство программ с открытыми исходниками является одновременно свободными[источник не указан 373 дня]. Определение Э.Реймонда ПО с открытым кодом и определение свободного ПО не полностью совпадают друг с другом, но близки, и большинство лицензий соответствуют обоим[уточнить]. При этом нужно учитывать, что следовать определению Реймонда совсем не собираются поставщики коммерческого ПО, поэтому часто возникает путаница.
Отличие между движениями открытого ПО и свободного ПО заключается в основном в приоритетах. Сторонники термина «open source» делают упор на эффективность открытых исходников как метода разработки, модернизации и сопровождения программ. Сторонники термина «free software» считают, что именно права человека на свободное распространение, модификацию и изучение используемых им программ являются главным достоинством свободного открытого ПО.

Results (English) 1:

The vast majority of open-source is both free [373]. Definition of e. Raymond open source software and free software definition does not fully coincide with each other, but close, and most licenses meet both [clarify]. It should be borne in mind that follow identify Raymond isn't going to commercial providers, so often there is confusion.Difference between open source movements and free software is mostly in priorities. Proponents of the term "open source" focus on efficiency of open source as a method of development, modernization and maintenance programs. Proponents of the term "free software" believe that the human right to free distribution, modification and study of its programmes are the main advantage of free open source software.

Results (English) 2:

The vast majority of OSS is both free [source not specified 373 days]. Determination E.Reymonda open source and definition of free software does not fully coincide with each other, but close, and most of the licenses comply with both [clarify]. It should be borne in mind that the definition of follow Raymond is not going to suppliers of commercial software, so often there is confusion.
The difference between the movements of open source software and free software is mainly in priorities. Proponents of the term «open source» focus on the effectiveness of open source as a method of development, modernization and maintenance programs. Proponents of the term «free software» believe that it is the human right to free distribution, modification and use them to study programs are the main advantage of the free open source software.

Results (English) 3:

the vast majority of open source software is both free and source not shown 373 days]. the definition of uh.raymond on the open source and free software definition do not fully coincide with each other, but close, and most licenses in both [clarify]. however, it should be taken into account.that follow the definition of raymond's not gonna suppliers of commercial software, so there is often confusion. "the difference between the movements of open and free software is mainly to priorities.proponents of the term "open source» emphasize the effectiveness of open source as a method to develop, upgrade and maintenance programmes. proponents of the term "free software» believewhat is the human right to free distribution, modification, and used them to study programmes are the main advantage of the free open.