Различают несколько степеней продук

Различают несколько степеней продуктивной конкуренции, различающихся степенью такого ее качества, как «мягкость / жесткость»: а) соревнования, когда партнер не несет угрозы и проиграл не погибает (например, в спорте проигравший не выбывает, а просто занимает более низкое место в рейтинге); б) соперничество, когда только победитель оказывается безусловно выиграл, другой партнер оказывается в абсолютном проигрыше (например, ситуация шахматного чемпионата мира), что означает нарушение партнерства, возникновение элементов конфликта, в) конфронтация, когда со стороны одного участника взаимодействия возникает намерение нанести другому убытки , то есть соперники превращаются во врагов. Границы между этими ступенями, конечно, условные, но важно, что последняя ступень непосредственно может перерасти в конфликт.
Конфликт иногда рассматривается как особая форма (или вид) взаимодействия и определяется как наличие противоположных тенденций у субъектов взаимодействия, проявляющиеся в их действиях. Специфика социально-психологического угла зрения на конфликт заключается в одновременном анализе двух составляющих: конфликтной ситуации и ее представленности в сознании участников. Это дало основания для обсуждения важнейшей общетеоретической проблемы конфликта - понимание природы как психологического феномена. Действительно: есть конфликт лишь форма психологического антагонизма (т.е. представленности противоречия в сознании) или это обязательно наличие конфликтных действий. Детальное описание различных конфликтов в их сложности и многообразии позволяет сделать вывод о том, что оба названных компонента обязательны признаки конфликта

Results (English) 1:

There are several levels of productive competition, differing degrees of quality, such as "the softness/hardness: a) competitions, when the partner does not accept threats and lost not killed (for example, in sports, the loser is eliminated and not just takes a lower rank); b) competition, where only the winner is clearly won, the other partner is the absolute loser (for example, the situation of the Chess World Championship), that means the violation of the partnership, the emergence of conflict, confrontation, where) of a party's intention to inflict another loss occurs, that is, the opponents become enemies. The boundaries between these levels, of course, conditional, but it is important that the last step directly can escalate into conflict.The conflict is sometimes regarded as a special form (or form) and is defined as the presence of opposing trends from subjects of interaction, manifested in their actions. The specificity of the social psychological angle of view on the conflict is the simultaneous analysis of two components: a conflict situation and of its representation in the minds of the participants. This gave rise to discussion of important general theoretical problems of conflict-understanding of nature as a psychological phenomenon. Indeed: there are only a form of psychological conflict of antagonism (i.e. presence of contradictions in the mind) or is it a conflict of action. A detailed description of the various conflicts in their complexity and variety, it can be concluded that both of these components are signs of conflict

Results (English) 2:

There are several degrees of productive competition, differing degrees of such of its quality as "softness / hardness" of: a) the competition, when the partner does not pose a threat and lost not die (for example, in sports loser is eliminated and just takes a lower place in the ranking) ; b) competition where only the winner is definitely won, the other partner is the absolute loss (for example, the situation of the chess world championship), which means a violation of the partnership, the emergence of elements of the conflict, and c) a confrontation when one participant from the interaction occurs intent to cause loss to another ie rivals turn into enemies. The boundaries between these stages, of course, conditional, but it is important that the last stage itself can escalate into conflict.
Conflict is sometimes seen as a special form (or type) interaction and is defined as the presence of opposing trends in the subjects of interaction, manifested in their actions. The specificity of the socio-psychological angle of view on the conflict lies in the simultaneous analysis of two components: the conflict and its representation in the minds of the participants. This gave reason to discuss important theoretical issues of the conflict - the understanding of nature as a psychological phenomenon. Indeed: there is a conflict only form of psychological antagonism (ie, the representation of the contradictions in the mind), or is it necessary to have conflicting actions. A detailed description of the various conflicts in their complexity and diversity allows us to conclude that both these components are essential features of the conflict

Results (English) 3:

There are only a few degrees productive competition, differing degree of its quality, as well as the softness / hardness": (a) competition, when a partner is not responsible threat and lost not killed (for example,In the area of sport loser is not loaded/unloaded, and simply took a more low place in the rating); (b) competition, where only the winner is certainly won,Another partner is the absolute losers (for example, the chess world championship), that would mean a violation of partnership, the emergence of conflict, in) confrontation,When on the part of one party's interaction is the intention to apply to another loss, the there is a rivals have become enemies. The boundary between the stages, of course, conditional, but it is important,That the last stage directly may escalate to conflict.
The conflict is sometimes viewed as a special form (or view) interaction and is defined as the opposite trends in actors interaction, manifesting themselves in their actions.The specific socio-psychological angle of view on the conflict is simultaneous analysis two components: situation of conflict and its representation in the minds.This gave grounds for discussion the essential vocational training issue of the conflict, psychological as well as understanding the nature of this phenomenon. It is true: there is a conflict only form psychological antagonism (i.e.Representation of contradictions in the minds) or this is necessarily a conflict of action. A detailed description of the various conflicts in their complexity and diversity allows you to the conclusion,That the two named component are mandatory signs conflict