SAIRANGUL: Да. Может быть я не знал

SAIRANGUL: Да. Может быть я не знала эту продукцию в естественных условиях, может быть у меня не вызывало бы таких ассоциаций, и я бы вообще не думала о ГМО. А когда это видишь такое перед собой, то конечно возникают вопросы, что же туда добавляли, что он такой вырос.
MODERATOR: Но в любом случае у вас не будет сомнений, все равно такой огромный употреблять?
SAIRANGUL: Если нужно будет, если не будет выбора. Если есть выбор, то я выберу… Но это связано не ГМО, а с внешним видом. Не могу я брать морковку такого размера, она у меня не ассоциируется с морковкой (томный смех).
MODERATOR: Что еще, кроме овощей и фруктов, мяса, вы сказали, какие еще продукты питания с ГМО
SAIRANGUL: Наверное, все, что связано с растительным происхождением. Сахар, мука это все связано с этим. Та же пшеница, для того, чтобы она была высокоустойчивой к внешней среде, туда, что-то добавляют.
MODERATOR: То есть пшеница и кукуруза, тоже?
SAIRANGUL: Все что растет, на сегодняшний день добавляется ГМО, в наших странах в меньшей степени. Но это связано, не с тем, что мы так хотим чистые продукты. Эти удобрения, которые содержатся в себе такие генетически модифицированные продукты, у нас бы все это было бы, но у нас это не развито.
MODERATOR: У нас такое не практикуется?
SAIRANGUL: Нет, практикуется, есть. Но я не думаю, что это массово. Потому что это дорого для наших аграриев. У них нет таких денег, покупать и обрабатывать. Я не думаю, что это с одной обработки будет результат, может несколько раз надо обрабатывать.
MODERATOR: То есть вы согласны, что и в кукурузе и в пшенице это возможно. Но это очень дорого в Казахстане, только в малых дозах.
SAIRANGUL: Да, я думаю это не массово.
MODERATOR: Если вернутся, вы говорили про ГМО. Если будет, такое предупреждение на этикетках продуктов питания или напитков, что это продукт содержит ГМО, что он нам говорит?
SAIRANGUL: Говорит, что этот продукт был произведен по средствам вмешательства человеческих рук. То есть были предприняты меры, для того, чтобы усилить какие-то свойства этого продукта.
MODERATOR: Это преимущество или наоборот?
SAIRANGUL: С точки зрения природы и вообще человека, конечно, это не преимущество. Преимущество всегда органически,естественно выращенная продукция, произведенная в условиях стандартных и так далее. Но для того времени, в котором мы сейчас живем, когда даже в воздухе много химикатов, это же все оседает на землю, вместе с дождем. Во-вторых, с ростом и появлением новых бактерий и вирусов, которые модифицированы, тоже благодаря человеку. Мы принимаем лекарственные средства, они воздействуют на бактерии, они не просто воздействуют, а наоборот помогают ему мутировать. Сейчас и бактерии стали намного устойчивей, чем они раньше были. Поэтому, наверное, нужно и растения тоже как-то усиливать и может наоборот это благо. Мы об этом узнаем лет через 50 -100 ГМО для нас благо и нет. Говорить сейчас об этом совсем рано. Результаты мы сейчас не увидим.

Results (English) 1:

SAIRANGUL: Yes. Maybe I didn't know these products in natural conditions, maybe I would not of such associations, and I'd not thought about GMOS. And when you see this, then of course there are questions what there added that he grew up.MODERATOR: But in either case, you will have no doubt, it is still such a huge drink?SAIRANGUL: If you want to be, if there is no selection. If you have a choice, I choose ... But this is not GMO appearance. Can't I take a carrot of this size, it is not associated with a carrot (languid laughter).MODERATOR: what else besides fruits and vegetables, meat, you said, what other foods with GMOSSAIRANGUL: probably everything associated with vegetable origin. Sugar, flour is all to do with this. The same wheat, so that it was vysokoustojčivoj to the external Wednesday, something added. MODERATOR: that is, wheat and corn, too?SAIRANGUL: All that is growing, today added GMO in our countries to a lesser extent. But it is not that we want clean products. These fertilisers contained such genetically modified products, we would be all that would be, but we are not developed.MODERATOR: we have not practiced?SAIRANGUL: no, practiced there. But I don't think it's massively. Because it is expensive for our farmers. They don't have that kind of money to buy and handle. I don't think this one will be the result of processing, may have to handle several times.MODERATOR: so you agree that in the corn and wheat possible. But it's very expensive in Kazakhstan, only in small doses.SAIRANGUL: Yes, I think it's not massively. MODERATOR: If you come back, you're talking about GMOS. If it is, such a warning on the labels of foods or drinks that this product contains GMOS, that he tell us? SAIRANGUL: said that this product was produced by means of intervention of human hands. That is, measures have been taken to strengthen any properties of this product.MODERATOR: this is an advantage or vice versa?SAIRANGUL: from the viewpoint of nature and human at all, of course, is not an advantage. The advantage of always organically, naturally grown products manufactured in conditions of standard and so on. But for the time, in which we now live, when even many chemicals in the air, it all settles to the ground, along with the rain. Secondly, with the growth and emergence of new bacteria and viruses that are modified, too, thanks man. We take medicines they affect bacteria, they don't just affect, but rather help him to mutate. And now the bacteria are much more stable than they were previously. Therefore, probably, need and plants too somehow amplify and may on the contrary this benefit. We learn about this years through 50-100 GMOS for us benefit. Talk now about this very soon. The results we now see.

Results (English) 2:

SAIRANGUL: Yes. Maybe I did not know this product in vivo, maybe I would not have caused such associations, and I would not have thought about GMOs. And when you see this in front of him, then of course there are questions, what there was added that he is grown.
MODERATOR: But in any case, you will have no doubt, still a huge eat?
SAIRANGUL: If you want to be, if not selection. If you have a choice, I choose ... But it is not GMO connected, and with the appearance. I can not I take a carrot that size, I have it is not associated with a carrot (languid laughter).
MODERATOR: What else, besides fruits and vegetables, meat, you say, what other foods with GMOs
SAIRANGUL: Perhaps all that is connected with vegetable origin. Sugar, flour is all connected with it. The same wheat, in order to make it highly resistant to its environment, there is then added.
MODERATOR: That is, wheat and corn, too?
SAIRANGUL: All growing GMO added to date in our country less . But this is due not to the fact that we want so friendly products. These fertilizers that contain such genetically modified foods, we would be all it would be, but we have not developed it.
MODERATOR: We is not practiced?
SAIRANGUL: No, practiced there. But I do not think it massively. Because it is expensive for our farmers. They do not have that kind of money to buy and process. I do not think that this one is the result of the processing may have to handle a few times.
MODERATOR: So you agree that in the maize and wheat as possible. But it is very expensive in Kazakhstan, but in small doses.
SAIRANGUL: Yes, I think it's not massively.
MODERATOR: If you come back, you talked about the GMO. If there is such a warning on the labels of food or drink that is a product contains GMOs, that he tells us?
SAIRANGUL: He says that this product has been manufactured by means of the intervention of human hands. That is, measures were taken in order to enhance some features of this product.
MODERATOR: This is an advantage, or vice versa?
SAIRANGUL: From the point of view of nature and man in general, of course, this is not an advantage. The advantage is always organic, naturally grown products are produced in a standard and so on. But for the time in which we now live, even when the air a lot of chemicals, it's all settles on the ground, together with the rain. Second, the growth and the emergence of new viruses and bacteria that have been modified, too thanks man. We take drugs, they affect the bacteria, they do not just act, but rather help it to mutate. Now and bacteria are much more stable than they were previously. Therefore, probably, it is necessary and plants also somehow amplify and may on the contrary it is good. We learn about it in 50 years -100 GMO good for us or not. Talk about it now quite early. The results we do not see.

Results (English) 3:

SAIRANGUL: yes. maybe i don"t know this product under natural conditions, may be i have not been to such associations, and i"d never thought about gmos. and when they see it in front of you, of course, issues arise that there added that he is grown up.MODERATOR, but in any case, you will have no doubt, still a big use?SAIRANGUL: if need be, if there is no choice. if there is a choice, i will choose, but it is not related to gmos, and appearance. i can"t take the carrot of this size, it"s not associated with carrot (languorous laughter).MODERATOR: what else fruits and vegetables, meat, you said, what other food products from gmSAIRANGUL: it must be because of plant origin. sugar, flour, this all has something to do with this. the wheat, she was высокоустойчивой to external environment, there is something added.MODERATOR: is wheat and corn, too?SAIRANGUL: all that is, to date, no gmo, in our countries and to a lesser extent. but this is not what we want clean products. the fertilizer contained in such genetically modified products, we have all this would be, but we have not developed.MODERATOR: we have this is not?SAIRANGUL: no, is there. but i don"t think it en masse. because it is expensive for our farmers. they have no money to buy and process. i don"t think it"s a processing result is, can a few times to process.MODERATOR: do you agree that in maize and wheat, it"s possible. but it is very expensive in kazakhstan, only in small doses.SAIRANGUL: yes, i think it is not mass-produced.MODERATOR: if you come back, you spoke about gmos. if there is a warning on the labels of food or drinks, this product contains gmos, it tell us?SAIRANGUL: said that this product was made by means of intervention of human hands. some steps have been taken in order to improve some properties of the product.MODERATOR: it"s an advantage or vice versa?SAIRANGUL: from the perspective of nature and man, of course, this is not an advantage. the advantage of always organically, naturally grown products manufactured in a standard and so on. but at the time, in which we now live, even when in the air a lot of chemicals, it"s all up to the ground, together with the rain. secondly, with the growth and the emergence of new bacteria and viruses that have been modified by man, too. we take the drugs they affect bacteria, they not only have, and vice versa, help him mutate. now the bacteria became much устойчивей than they once were. however, i have plants and also somehow enhance and vice versa is good. will we know that years of 50 - 100 gm for us