Интерактивная сторона общения - это

Интерактивная сторона общения - это условный термин, обозначающий характеристику тех компонентов общения, которые связаны с взаимодействием людей, с непосредственной организацией их совместной деятельности.
Исследование проблемы взаимодействия в психологии управления имеет давнюю традицию. Интуитивно легко допустить несомненную связь, которая существует между общением и взаимодействием людей, однако трудно развести эти понятия и тем самым сделать эксперименты более точно ориентированными.
Одни ученые просто отождествляют общение и взаимодействие, интерпретируя и то и другое как коммуникацию в узком смысле слова (то есть как обмен информацией), другие рассматривают отношения между взаимодействием и общением как отношение формы некоторого процесса и его содержания. Иногда предпочитают говорить о связанном, но все же самостоятельное существование общения как коммуникации и взаимодействия как интеракции. Часть этих разночтений порождена терминологическими трудностями, в частности тем, что понятие «общение» употребляется то узком, то в широком смысле слова.
В процессе общения в коллективе формируется общность взглядов на принципиальные вопросы, определяет все дальнейшее взаимодействие субъектов совместной деятельности, их стратегию поведения, то есть формируется общая позиция, способствует интеграции сотрудников в единое социальное целое. Только в таких случаях коллектив способен успешно решать задачи той сложности, которая соответствует уровню компетентности его членов.

Results (English) 1:

Interactive communication-this side of the conditional term for the characteristics of the components of communication associated with the interaction of people with the Organization of their joint activities.Study on the problems of interaction in management psychology has a long tradition. Intuitively easy to allow unequivocal link between communication and interaction between people, but it is difficult to separate these concepts and thereby make the experiment more precisely focused.Some scientists simply identify communication and interaction, interpreting both as communication in the strict sense (that is, as information exchange), others view the relationship between interaction and communication as a form of a process and its content. Sometimes prefer to speak of, but the separate existence of communication as communication and interaction as interaction. Part of the confusion generated by the terminological difficulties, in particular that the notion of "communication" is used the narrow, in the broad sense of the word.In the process of communication in the team is formed by the convergence of views on policy questions, determines all further interaction of actors, their strategy of behavior, that is, a common position, facilitates the integration of employees into a cohesive social unit. Only in such cases, the team is able to successfully meet the challenges of complexity, which corresponds to the level of competence of its members.

Results (English) 2:

Interactive aspect of communication - it is a conditional term for characterization of those components of communication that are associated with the interaction of people with the immediate organization of their joint activities.
Study of the problem of interaction in the psychology of management has a long tradition. Intuitively easy to make the obvious connection that exists between the communication and interaction between people, but it is difficult to separate these concepts and thus make the experiments more accurately oriented.
Some scholars simply equate communication and interaction, interpreting both as communication in the narrow sense (ie, as the exchange of information), others consider the relationship between interaction and communication as the ratio of the form of a process and its content. Sometimes prefer to talk about related, but nevertheless independent existence of communication as communication and interaction as interaction. Some of these discrepancies is generated by terminological difficulties, in particular the fact that the term "communication" is used narrowly, in the broad sense of the word.
In the process of communication in a team formed by the commonality of views on matters of principle, determines all future joint activities between subjects, their strategy of behavior, that is formed by the common position, promotes the integration of employees into a single social whole. Only in such cases, the team is able to successfully meet the challenges of the complexity, which corresponds to the level of competence of its members.

Results (English) 3:

The on-line side communication - this is a conditional term that identifies the characteristic components of communications, which are related to the interaction between people, with the immediate organization their joint activities.
Study of the problem in the interaction between psychology management has a long-standing tradition. An intuitive easy to allow unequivocal relationship that exists between talking and interaction between people,However, it is difficult to separate these concepts and thereby make experiments more accurately oriented.
some scientists simply equate communication and interaction,NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop and the other as a communication in the narrow sense of the word (that is, as soon as an exchange of information).Others are considering relations between interaction and communication as the ratio of some process and its content. Sometimes prefer to speak on the associated,But the same self-the existence of the communication as well as communication and interaction as well as interstate comparisons. Part of the confusion stems from terminological difficulties, in particular the factThat the notion of "communication" is used It is a narrow, in the broad sense of the word.
in the communication in a team is a commonality of views on questions of principle,Determines all further interaction between actors joint activities, their strategy of behavior, that is a common position, facilitates the integration of staff in a single social unit.Only in such cases, the team is able to address successfully the challenges of complexity, which is consistent with the level of competence.