В чаптерах 3-4 ситуация немного пер

В чаптерах 3-4 ситуация немного переходит в русло напряжения и в большинстве случаев я начинаю не соглашаться с автором. Она утверждает, что женщина не имеющая образования и манер не может быть достойной матерью. Да, я согласна, но в то же время нет. Один из моих аргументов против этого выражения то, что любая женщина должна быть матерью и только родив ребенка, она может научиться быть матерью. Сколько бы ты не учил то как быть юристом или социологом, это не поможет женщине стать лучшей мамой или худшей. Те женщины которые не мечтают о детях и не желают их не поймут меня ровно так, как и не понимают автора женщины любящие детей.
Я согласна с автором в том, что женщины используют свою красоту дабы получить контроль над мужчиной ибо будучи на равнее с мужчиной она потеряет силу. Любая женщина прежде всего должна быть привлекательна. Каждая любящая себя девушка в первую очередь выглядит достойно для себя и только потом для кого то. Ты можешь всю жизнь учиться, хвалиться своей начитанностью но при этом жить в одиночестве. Так уж построено в обществе, что мужчины должны быть умнее женщин и направлять их. Я против того, что бы женщины были глупы, не образованны или что бы мужчины над ними доминировали. Я лишь пытаюсь сказать, что в любом случае, мужчина это поддержка для женщины, ровно так же как и женщина для мужчины. Писатель так же упоминала о том, что необразованная женщина оставшись вдовой не сможет прокормить своих детей. Я в этом полностью согласна и поэтому считаю, что жизненно важные вещи в жизни человека, такие как право на образование, право на голосование , право на работу не должны опираться на пол. Мы все люди и имеем равные права, поэтому должны получать все равносильно.
В заключении хотелось бы сказать, что мужчина это опора и защита для женщины. Это не означает то, что женщина слабая и не способная себя обеспечить. Это лишь говорит о том, что мужчины должны быть нежнее к женщинам и должны понять, что свободу женщинам дают не они, так как однажды когда Бог создал человека он дал свободу Адаму ровно такую же как и Еве.

Results (English) 1:

In čapterah 3-4 situation a little goes into stress and in most cases, I'm starting to disagree with the author. She claims that she has no education and manners may not be a worthy mother. Yes, I agree, but at the same time not. One of my arguments against this expression that any woman should be his mother and only child when she gave birth, she can learn how to be a mother. How much would you not taught how to be a lawyer or sociologist, it doesn't help a woman become the best mom, or worse. Those women who do not dream of children and do not wish them to not understand me exactly as the author's and do not understand women loving children. I agree with the author that women use their beauty to gain control over a man for being combined with a man she will lose force. Any woman should be attractive. Each loving yourself girl primarily looks good for myself and only then for someone. You can learn all his life, his načitannost′û to boast but to live in solitude. So built in society that men should be smarter than women and guide them. I am against the fact that women were stupid, not educated or that men over them dominated. I'm just trying to say that in any case, the man is support for women, exactly the same as a woman for a man. The same writer mentioned that illiterate woman left a widow will not be able to feed their children. I completely agree and therefore believe that vital things in human life, such as the right to education, the right to vote, the right to work should not rely on the floor. We are all human beings and have equal rights, so should receive all amounts to.In conclusion, I should like to say that man is the support and protection for women. This does not mean that a woman is weak and not able to support themselves. It only says that men must be softer than women and must understand that they not give women freedom, because once when God created man he gave freedom exactly same as Adam and Eve.

Results (English) 2:

The situation is a bit of a chapter 3-4 passes in the channel voltage and in most cases, I start to disagree with the author. She claims that she is not having the education and manners can not be a decent mother. Yes, I agree, but at the same time not. One of my arguments against this expression is that every woman should be a mother giving birth and only child, she can learn to be a mother. How much would you have been taught how to be a lawyer or a sociologist, it does not help a woman become a better mom or worse. Those women who do not dream of children and do not want them not to understand me exactly like and do not understand the author's women who love children.
I agree with the author that women use their beauty in order to gain control over a man for being on equal terms with men, she lose strength. Any woman should be especially attractive. Every girl loves himself above all looks good for themselves and then for someone else. You can learn all his life, to praise his erudition but to live in solitude. So it is constructed in a society that men should be smarter than women and guide them. I'm against the fact that women were stupid, not education or whatever men have dominated over them. I'm just trying to say that in any case, the man is the support for a woman, exactly the same as a woman for a man. The writer also mentioned that an uneducated woman left a widow can not feed their children. I completely agree on this, and so I think it is vitally important things in life, such as the right to education, the right to vote, the right to work should not be based on gender. We are all human beings have equal rights and, therefore, should receive all equivalent.
In conclusion I would like to say that man is a support and protection for women. This does not mean that women are weak and unable to provide for themselves. It only says that the men should be gentle and women need to understand that women are given freedom, they do not, as once when God created man, he gave Adam freedom exactly the same as Eve.

Results (English) 3:

in чаптерах 3 - 4 the situation a little goes into tension and, in most cases, i'm starting to disagree with the author. she claims that the woman has no education and manners may not be a mother. yes,i agree, but at the same time. one of my arguments against that of what a woman should be a mother, and has a child, she can learn to be a mother.if you haven't learned how to be a lawyer or a sociologist, it won't help a woman to be the best mom, or worse. those women who do not want children, and do not want them to understand me exactly.and do not understand the women and children. "i agree with the author that women use their beauty to get control of a man for being равнее with a man she collapses.every woman must first be attractive. each girl loving yourself first looks good for themselves and only then for someone. can you a lifetime to learn.show off your начитанностью but to live in loneliness. a built in society, men should be smarter than women and direct them. i am opposed to women are stupidnot educated or that men dominated over them. i'm just trying to say that, in any case, a man's support for women, exactly like the woman for the man. the writer also mentionedwhat uneducated woman left a widow would not be able to feed their children. i fully agree and therefore believe that the essential things in life, such as the right to educationthe right to vote, the right to work, should not rely on the floor. we all people have equal rights, and should therefore receive all amounts to. in conclusion, i would like to say that a man is a support and protection for women.this doesn't mean that the woman is weak and unable to. it is said that the men should be superior to women and the need to understand what freedom of women are not theyso one day when god created man, he gave exactly the freedom of adam and eve.