Безусловно, различные отклонения мо

Безусловно, различные отклонения могут быть предметом исследования искусства, но весь вопрос в том, каким образом это делается. Чехов тоже написал «Палату № 6», но при этом не смаковал пикантные подробности, а говорил об ужасающем насилии над человеческой личностью, и рассказ его полон сочувствия, сострадания слабому, несчастному. Но когда подобные фильмы или книги создаются исключительно ради того, чтобы вызвать скандал, привлечь к себе внимание, это, на мой взгляд, ничего общего не имеет ни с искусством, ни с культурой.

Results (English) 1:

Of course, different variations can be the subject of art, but the question is how it's done. Chekhov also wrote "House No. 6, but not savored juicy details, and spoke of the appalling violence against human beings, and his story is full of sympathy, pity poor, unhappy. But when such films or books are created purely to cause scandal to attract attention, it is, in my opinion, has nothing in common with either the arts or culture.

Results (English) 2:

Of course, different variations may be the subject of study of art, but the question is how to do it. Chekhov also wrote "House number 6", but did not relish the juicy details, and spoke of the terrible violence against the human person and his story is full of sympathy, compassion, weak, miserable. But when these movies or books created solely in order to cause a scandal, to attract attention, it is, in my opinion, has nothing to do with any art or the culture.

Results (English) 3:

Of course, the various deviations may be the subject of a study of art, but the question as to how that was being done. Czechs are also wrote "House 6 ", but when this is not смаковал spicy details,And spoke about the horrific violence on the human person, and find out about his full sympathy, compassion and exhibitors, an accident. But when such movies or books are created exclusively for theOrder to cause scandal, to draw the attention, this is, in my view, has nothing with the art, nor with the culture.